Why Can’t Women Be Priests?
By John Houk
Catholics are being asked to accept that Jesus chose twelve men to be apostles with the specific intention that he would forever exclude women from ordained ministry. Did Jesus really do that?
Here are some reasons why Catholics continue to ask why, really, why can’t women be priests?
Canon 212.3 states: “According to the knowledge, competence, and prestige which they (the faithful) possess, they have the right and even the duty to manifest to the sacred pastors their opinion on matters which pertain to the good of the Church...” When a practice of the Church hinders instead of promotes the spreading of the Good News we have the duty to question it.
The credibility of the Church is at stake
One must be just to preach justice. By refusing to demonstrate by deeds that it
is actually a champion of the full human dignity of women, the Church loses
credibility on the subject of women’s treatment in the world and even becomes
complicit in their mistreatment.
The question could not be asked until women were finally seen as full and complete human persons. That did not happen in the official language of the Church until the 1960’s. Prior to that the Church’s “constant teaching” was that there was something wrong with women. Women lacked the “perfection” of men and were by their nature subordinate to men. Imperfect and subordinate women could not be priests so why raise the question?
The exclusion of women is NOT “part of” the deposit of
faith.
In 1995 the English translation of an official document stated that the exclusion of women from the priesthood was indeed “part of” the deposit of faith. In 1996 a clarification was issued that claimed a “translation problem” and said that the correct language is “pertains to” the deposit of faith. This teaching is NOT revealed truth but is somehow(?) related to revealed truth. The correction has not been made in U.S. Church documents.
Slavery was
embedded in the culture of Christian Europe and the
A 1976 Pontifical Biblical Commission answered “no” when asked if anything in Scripture excluded women from the priesthood. The Commission’s statement became public only because it was “leaked” to the press.
Looking like Jesus is not enough
Catholics are asked to accept that the symbolic value of
the priest requires that the priest look like Jesus, i.e. that the priest be
male. Priests do have a call to provide
the world with a Christ-like example of living and relating to others, and
gender has nothing to do with being a Christ-like-person.
We have a prophetic calling
The Church has a prophetic purpose. “Your will be done on earth as it is in
heaven.” We hope for, and work for, an
earth that has heaven as its model.
Women will be fully human and full participants in heaven and we have a
prophetic call to include them fully now.
They doth protest too
loudly
The
Love demands it
Love demands the ability to view reality from the eyes of
the other. The Church’s long acceptance
of slavery changed when we began to look at slavery from the eyes of the
slave. Now the Church must do the same
for women.
The Papal “No”, by Deborah Halter.
A History of Women and Ordination, Vol. 2 by Ida Raming,
Ph.D., Scarerow Press,
Ordained Women in the Early Church by Kevin Madigan and Carol Osiek,
The Church that Can and Cannot Change, by John T. Noonan,
Jr.
www.romancatholicwomenpriests.org